Current:Home > reviewsWhat to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next -Aspire Financial Strategies
What to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next
View
Date:2025-04-16 20:03:21
Washington — An unprecedented ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that bans former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 ballot is unlikely to be the final word on the matter.
The court put its ruling on hold until Jan. 4, anticipating that Trump would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up a showdown to decide whether the Republican presidential front-runner can remain in the race just as primaries begin in early states.
What did the ruling say?
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that former President Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under the Constitution's so-called insurrection clause. But the issue divided the seven justices — all of whom were appointed by Democratic governors.
"President Trump did not merely incite the insurrection," the court wrote in the 4-to-3 ruling. "Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President [Mike] Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes. These actions constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection."
The court issued several findings in its decision, including:
- The Jan. 6, 2021, riot was an an insurrection
- Trump "engaged in" an insurrection
- Trump's speech "inciting the crowd" before the riot was "not protected by the First Amendment"
- Colorado law allows voters to challenge Trump's eligibility under the insurrectionist clause
- The clause can be enforced without action from Congress
- The clause applies to the presidency
Can Trump appeal?
The Trump campaign called the decision "completely flawed" and said it will "swiftly" appeal the ruling.
"We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor," Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement.
David Becker, CBS News election law contributor, said it's not mandatory that the Supreme Court take this case, but "it's almost a 100% likelihood that they will take on this case."
What is the insurrection clause?
The Constitution's insurrection clause — Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — has been used to challenge Trump's eligibility for the ballot in several states.
The provision seeks to prevent those who swore an oath to support the Constitution but "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. from holding state or federal office. It originally sought to keep former Confederate civil and military officeholders from serving in government and has rarely been used in modern times. The Colorado Supreme Court's decision is the first time it's been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
Does it apply to other states?
Anti-Trump plaintiffs have brought the insurrectionist clause argument to keep Trump off the ballot to courts in several states.
The Colorado ruling does not apply to other states, though it could embolden others to take action. Colorado, which leans Democrat, is not a competitive state for Trump in the general election. However, if Trump were to be disqualified from the ballot in a swing state, it would put Republicans at a massive disadvantage.
The Colorado ruling stands in contrast with several recent legal decisions on the matter.
Last month, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision said the state party can put anyone on its primary ballot. But the court said petitioners could try again in the context of the general election.
In Michigan, the court of appeals decided just last week that it won't stop Trump from appearing on the state's 2024 Republican primary ballot. The court affirmed two lower court rulings, without determining whether the insurrection clause applied to Trump.
"Who to place on the primary ballot is determined by the political parties and the individual candidates," the appeals court said in a 3-0 opinion, citing Michigan law.
- In:
- Colorado
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Donald Trump
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at cbsnews.com and is based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.
TwitterveryGood! (3951)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- FACT FOCUS: A look at false claims around Kamala Harris and her campaign for the White House
- Designer Hayley Paige reintroduces herself after regaining name and social media accounts after lengthy legal battle
- Charmed's Holly Marie Combs Reveals Shannen Doherty Promised to Haunt Her After Death
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Andre Seldon Jr., Utah State football player and former Belleville High School star, dies in apparent drowning
- New York Regulators Found High Levels of TCE in Kindra Bell’s Ithaca Home. They Told Her Not to Worry
- Hunter Biden drops lawsuit against Fox News over explicit images featured in streaming series
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- U.S. travel advisory level to Bangladesh raised after police impose shoot-on-sight curfew amid protests
Ranking
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Baltimore man arrested in deadly shooting of 12-year-old girl
- Bruce Springsteen's net worth soars past $1B, Forbes reports
- Pilot living her dream killed in crash after skydivers jump from plane near Niagara Falls
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Plane crashes near the site of an air show in Wisconsin, killing the 2 people on board
- AI industry is influencing the world. Mozilla adviser Abeba Birhane is challenging its core values
- Mega Millions winning numbers for July 19 drawing: Jackpot now worth $279 million
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
ACC commissioner promises to fight ‘for as long as it takes’ amid legal battles with Clemson, FSU
Peak global population is approaching, thanks to lower fertility rates: Graphics explain
CrowdStrike says more machines fixed as customers, regulators await details on what caused meltdown
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
16 and Pregnant Star Sean Garinger's Cause of Death Revealed
The 10 biggest Paris Olympics questions answered, from Opening Ceremony to stars to watch
Blake Lively Reacts to Ryan Reynolds Divorce Rumors