Current:Home > ContactDemocratic lawmakers slam the lack of attorney access for asylum-seekers in Border Patrol custody -Aspire Financial Strategies
Democratic lawmakers slam the lack of attorney access for asylum-seekers in Border Patrol custody
View
Date:2025-04-18 22:30:53
WASHINGTON (AP) — Dozens of Democratic members of Congress asked the Biden administration Tuesday to end expedited screening of asylum-seekers in Border Patrol custody, calling it a “rushed practice” that has allowed little access to legal counsel.
As the administration prepared to launch speedy screenings at Border Patrol holding facilities this spring , authorities pledged access to counsel would be a key difference from a Trump-era version of the policy. So far, that promise appears unfulfilled.
A coterie of involved attorneys estimated that perhaps 100 migrants secured formal representation in the first three months of the policy, The Associated Press reported last month, and only hundreds more have received informal advice through one-time phone calls ahead of the expedited screenings. That represents a mere fraction of the thousands of expedited screenings since early April, though authorities have not provided a precise count.
The letter to the Homeland Security and Justice Departments, signed by 13 senators and 53 members of the House of Representatives, said conducting the “credible fear” interviews as little as 24 hours after arrival in a holding facility was “inherently problematic,” especially without access to counsel.
“Affording people fair adjudication — including adequate time to obtain evidence, prepare one’s case, and obtain and work with counsel — is particularly key for individuals fleeing life-threatening harm or torture,” the letter states.
Those signing include Alex Padilla of California, chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Rep. Nanette Barragán of California, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
The Homeland Security Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The administration ramped up the speedy screenings as it ended pandemic-related asylum restrictions, known as Title 42 authority, and introduced new rules that make it far more difficult for people to seek asylum without applying online outside the U.S. or first seeking protection in a country they pass through.
The percentage of people who passed asylum screenings fell to 60% during the first half of July, after the fast-track process picked up, down from 77% the second half of March, just before it began.
The administration has faced criticism from immigration advocates that the new rules ignore obligations under U.S. and international law to provide asylum and from those backing restrictions who say authorities are acting too generously through the online appointment system, which admits up to 1,450 people a day, and parole for up to 30,000 a month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
veryGood! (7374)
Related
- Small twin
- Algae blooms prompt 2 warnings along parts of New Hampshire’s Lake Winnipesaukee
- The FAA and NTSB are investigating an unusual rolling motion of a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max
- Shoppers Say This Peter Thomas Roth Serum Makes Them Look Younger in 2 Days & It’s 60% off Right Now
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- A Virginia school board restored Confederate names. Now the NAACP is suing.
- New Jersey casino and sports betting revenue was nearly $510 million in May, up 8.3%
- 21-year-old Georgia woman breaks fishing record that had been untouched for nearly half a century
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- AI startup Perplexity wants to upend search business. News outlet Forbes says it’s ripping them off
Ranking
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Euro 2024 squads: Full roster for every team
- Book called Ban This Book is now banned in Florida. Its author has this to say about the irony.
- Opal Lee gets keys to her new Texas home 85 years after a racist mob drove her family from that lot
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Bridgerton Star Luke Newton Confirms Romance With Dancer Antonia Roumelioti
- Brittany Mahomes Shares Glimpse Into Workout Progress After Fracturing Her Back
- Amazon reveals the best books of 2024 (so far): The No. 1 pick 'transcends its own genre'
Recommendation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Nonprofit offers Indian women cash, other assistance to deal with effects of extreme heat
OpenAI appoints former top US cyberwarrior Paul Nakasone to its board of directors
6 minors charged in 15-year-old boy's drowning death in Georgia
Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
Biden, Meloni meet on sidelines of G7 summit but one notable matter wasn’t on the table: abortion
‘Tis the season for swimming and bacteria alerts in lakes, rivers
Florida A&M, a dubious donor and $237M: The transformative HBCU gift that wasn’t what it seemed